Nineteen European Union member states, including Cyprus and Greece, have officially supported a plan to establish migrant return centres located outside the EU's borders. A joint letter sent to the European Commission on December 16th emphasizes a strong desire to speed up the implementation of EU return directives. The proposal also aims to create a more solid legal and financial structure for these external processing centres. This initiative is gaining momentum just before an important European Council summit, although migration management is not on the official agenda.
The driving force behind this collaborative effort is the belief that there is a favourable political climate within the EU for implementing stricter border controls. Supporters of the plan argue that the EU's current migration system is inadequate without stronger partnerships with countries along key transit routes and those where migration originates. For nations like Cyprus and Greece, which receive a disproportionately large number of irregular arrivals due to their proximity to unstable regions, this strategy is considered essential for a more practical and effective migration policy.
The core of the proposal centres on "innovative solutions," which are understood to include setting up dedicated return hubs in non-EU countries. These facilities would process individuals not eligible for asylum, thereby facilitating their return to their home countries or transit nations. The member states are urging the European Commission to accelerate the practical application of existing EU laws concerning migrant returns. They also want assistance in identifying safe third countries and establishing the necessary legal framework for these external centres. Furthermore, these countries are seeking a clear financial strategy from the EU to support these ambitious plans.
Ministers from the signatory countries are advocating for more structured and in-depth cooperation with these third countries. This partnership is intended to cover not only the operation of return centres but also broader efforts to address the underlying causes of irregular migration. The proposal specifically asks the Commission to provide detailed guidance on how current and future EU financial resources can fund these return hubs and related infrastructure. Strict adherence to the EU's budgetary regulations will be maintained throughout this process.
This coordinated action demonstrates a growing agreement among a significant portion of EU member states regarding an externalised approach to managing migration. It clearly indicates a demand for the practical use of established legal frameworks and acknowledges the crucial need for dedicated EU funding to support these offshore projects. The success of this strategy will ultimately depend on the willingness and ability of non-EU countries to cooperate. Navigating potential legal complexities will also be a significant factor. Italy's recent experience with migrant centres in Albania, which are currently facing legal challenges, serves as a clear reminder of the intricate obstacles in operationalising such ambitious external partnerships. The coming months will likely show how effectively the European Commission and the EU can achieve a unified approach to this complex and urgent issue.