The head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, spoke out against Europe using less nuclear energy. She called this a "strategic mistake" in a recent speech in Paris. This statement has started a big talk about the EU's future energy plans. Europe is facing high energy prices and needs more energy security. These issues show how difficult energy policy can be for the EU.
Von der Leyen's words go against a trend in countries like Germany. Nuclear power used to be a main source of electricity in Europe. In 1990, it provided about one-third of Europe's power. Now, it provides only about 15%. This is partly because of public worries after the 2011 Fukushima accident. This event caused a political change, and countries like Germany decided to stop using nuclear power.
Although the EU has increased renewable energy, like wind and solar power, less nuclear power has made Europe buy more oil and gas. This reliance became risky when prices rose sharply in 2022. The war in Ukraine also showed Europe's weakness. Russia reduced gas supplies, and gas power plants became more important. Fossil fuels are still used a lot for transport and heating.
Germany's Environment Minister, Carsten Schneider, disagrees with von der Leyen. He said renewable energy is "cleaner, safer, and cheaper." He also mentioned it does not create radioactive waste. This different view shows a split within the EU about energy. The EU budget also does not fund nuclear projects because of this disagreement.
Europe's lower nuclear power output has led to higher energy costs. It also created risks because Europe depends on other countries for energy. The debate about nuclear power's role is very important. The EU wants to be more environmentally friendly and have secure, affordable energy. The question of whether reducing nuclear power was a mistake or a good step will continue. Future decisions will shape Europe's energy for many years.